US Senate
Moves to Stop Horse Slaughter
URGENT ACTION NEEDED TODAY!
UPDATE: Sept. 19, 2005
Dear Humanitarian:
The US Senate is poised to vote on legislation to stop the brutal
slaughter of American horses for human consumption in foreign
countries. An identical measure by Congressmen John Sweeney (R-NY)
and John Spratt (D-SC) passed overwhelmingly in the US House of
Representatives on June 8.
Senator John Ensign (R-NV), one of only two veterinarians in
Congress, and Senator Robert C. Byrd (D-WV) are expected to
introduce an amendment to the Senate Agriculture Appropriations bill
that prohibits the use of any federal taxpayer funds to slaughter
horses.
Please take a moment to contact your Senators
TODAY,
urging his or her immediate
support of the Ensign/Byrd
amendment to the Senate Agriculture Appropriations Bill.
The Senate will consider the amendment during the week of Sept. 19
(most likely on Tuesday, Sept. 20), so your immediate assistance is
critical. If you would like additional facts or need to find the
name of your Senators, visit our Web site at
http://www.saplonline.org/congress.htm or call us at
(703) 836-4300.
WHAT YOU CAN DO:
Please call or fax your Senators today and every day until
the Amendment is voted on. Refer to
the fact sheet below for specific points to discuss.
Ask your Senators to support the Ensign/Byrd Agriculture
Appropriations Amendment (prohibiting your tax dollars
from being spent on horse slaughter) and respectfully request his or
her specific position the issue.
Capitol Hill Operator: (202) 224-3121
(they will help you reach your Senators)
Your immediate assistance is essential to ensure the Senate hears
from an outpouring of concerned constituents; the House of
Representatives did, and the horses won. Please share our "Dear
Humanitarian" eAlert with family, friends and coworkers, and
encourage them to make phone calls and send faxes, too. As always,
please share any responses you receive from Congress with us.
Thank you so much for your help!
Sincerely,
Cathy Liss
Legislative Director
________________________________
FACTS ABOUT HORSE SLAUGHTER
-
Last year three foreign-owned slaughter plants cruelly slaughtered
more than 65,000 horses for human consumption in Europe and Asia.
-
Tens of thousands more of America's horses were exported and
slaughtered in other countries. Slaughter is NOT humane
euthanasia. Horses suffer horribly on the way to and
during slaughter.
-
Passage of the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act (AHSPA)
will reduce animal suffering - hence its wide support throughout
the equestrian and veterinary world, as well as the humane
community.
-
Americans support an end to horse slaughter for human consumption
overwhelmingly (polls from Kentucky, Texas and Utah respectively
show that 82, 72 and 69 percent of those questioned oppose the
practice). In California, a 1998 ballot initiative (Prop. 6)
banning horse slaughter for human consumption passed with 60
percent of the vote.
1. Sick and old horses to slaughter
Question: Is it true that slaughter is
only a last resort for infirm, dangerous or horses who are no longer
serviceable?
Answer: 92.3 percent of horses arriving
at slaughter plants in this country are in "good" condition,
according to the US Department of Agriculture's Guidelines for
Handling and Transporting Equines to Slaughter.
2. Neglect and abuse
Question: Will horse abuse and neglect
cases rise significantly following a ban on slaughter?
Answer: There has been no documented
rise in abuse and neglect cases in California since the state banned
horse slaughter for human consumption in 1998. There is no
documented rise in Illinois following closure of the state's only
horse slaughter plant in 2002.
3. Cost of caring for "unwanted horses."
Question: If there is a ban on horse
slaughter, will horse rescue and retirement groups have the
resources to take care of unwanted horses? Should the government
have to pay for the care of horses given up voluntarily by their
owners?
Answer: Not every horse going to
slaughter will need to be absorbed into the rescue community. Many
will be sold to a new owner, others will be kept longer and a
licensed veterinarian will humanely euthanize some. Opponents of
this legislation admit passage of the bill will not necessarily lead
to an increase in the number of horses sent to rescue facilities,
precisely because humane euthanasia is so widely used. It is not
the government's responsibility to provide for the care of horses
given up voluntarily by their owners, as these animals are private
property. Hundreds of horse rescue organizations operate around the
country, and additional facilities are being established (a list is
available).
4. A safe and humane solution for sick, old and
unwanted horses
Question: If slaughter is not an
option, what will we do with sick, old and "unwanted horses?"
Answer: Approximately 690,000 horses
die annually in this country (10 percent of an estimated population
of 6.9 million) and the vast majority are not slaughtered, but
euthanized and rendered or buried without any negative environmental
impact. Humane euthanasia and carcass disposal is highly affordable
and widely available. The average cost of having a horse humanely
euthanized and safely disposing of the animal's carcass is
approximately $225, while the average monthly cost of keeping a
horse is approximately $200.
5. Export of horses for slaughter abroad
Question: If there is a ban on horse
slaughter in the United States, will there be an increase in the
export of horses for foreign slaughter? Will horses suffer from
longer transport for slaughter in countries where there may be
weaker welfare laws?
Answer: Horse slaughter has declined
dramatically in the United States over the past decade, but there
has been no correlating increase in the number of American horses
exported for slaughter abroad. Further, the AHSPA prohibits the
export of horses for slaughter abroad and contains clear enforcement
and penalty provisions to prevent this from happening. Risk of
federal prosecution and the high costs associated with illegally
transporting horses long distances for slaughter abroad are strong
deterrents.
6. Standards of care at sanctuaries and rescue
organizations
Question: Is it true no standards
exist for horse rescue facilities that take unwanted horses?
Answer: The Doris Day Animal League
and the Animal Welfare Institute published "Basic Guidelines for
Operating an Equine Rescue or Retirement Facility" in 2004.
Additionally, the Association of Sanctuaries and the American
Sanctuaries Association provide accreditation programs, a code of
ethics and guidelines for the operation of sanctuaries and rescue
organizations. Horse rescue groups must also provide for the
welfare of horses in their custody in compliance with state and
local animal welfare laws.
7. Use of horsemeat in pet food
Question: If there is a ban on horse
slaughter, will horsemeat no longer be available for pet food?
Answer: There is no horsemeat in pet
food. This practice stopped decades ago and has some connection to
the enactment of protections for America's wild horses in 1971. The
US public and Congress were outraged to learn federal agencies were
rounding up and allowing the exploitation and slaughter of these
national treasures for items such as pet food. Some by-products of
the horse slaughter industry are used in various consumer items, but
they are derived from the rendering of dead horses (a different
process than slaughter and not affected by the AHSPA) and other
animals.